East Range Episcopal Churches:
who we were
Our name reveals much of who we
were and how we came to be. Until January 2007, we were the Episcopal
Churches located on the eastern end of the Mesabi Iron Range from
the towns of Ely, Tower, Virginia, Eveleth, and Hoyt Lakes. These
towns began as mining towns, and basically still are mining towns.
Usually when a mining town ceases to be a mining town it becomes
a ghost town. Mining is the economy; it is the reason people gather
together and hang their houses in clusters along the edge of broad
and deep pits. Some active mines have devoured towns as they grew;
the towns just disappeared leaving only rough memories and records
of their existence, sometimes the town moved to leave streets,
sidewalks, and steps behind as sentinels in meadows. We all know
that our towns could go the way of Sparta, Franklin, and Section
30. Some of our towns are hanging in suspension between mining
town and ghost town. Our very existence depends on our ability
to dig, crush and sell the very rock that we walk and set our
houses on. If we can no longer find the rock, or if it becomes
too expensive to dig it up, or if no one wants to buy it, then
we all could very well become part of the dust left behind as
the ore is shipped out.
Like many other mining towns we are located in a non-agricultural
part of the country. Our land is not deep top soil, and we don't
have warm summer corn-growing nights. We are a people of the rock,
lakes, swamps and forest. The forest, like mining, has provided
another kind of transient economy. The folklore, the early stories
of logging and mining have much in common. Saloons and brothels
were the benchmarks of the beginning towns. The towns are made
up of people on the move; they were "packsackers", usually bachelors
making their way through to someplace else. Often stories of the
men, like Paul Bunyan and John Henry, achieved heroic stature,
with feats of strength and power. The movement was western. From
Michigan to Wisconsin to Minnesota and on west. Miners followed
the iron ore; loggers followed the white pine. The white pine
is gone, and those loggers who have stayed here now find work
logging pulp wood. They are scattered about in homes sprinkled
around in the woods, and they truck their wood to different industrial
sites. Like mining, clear cutting leaves massive gaps of barren
landscape. Like the ghost towns there are harsh reminders of what
was once forest, but now almost impossible to remember. We talk
about "tree harvest" the way a farmer may talk about harvesting
small grain. We use the words but we know that it is not the same.
When we think of stewardship of the iron ore from the mines and
the wood from forest that is entrusted to us, the language and
the stories work for a sense of accountability. But if we try
to think of the environmental stewardship with mining and logging,
then the language and the stories of "stewardship" fall short
of describing the ethical dilemma with which we must live. Can
we have steel or wood products without wreaking extreme violence
on the environment? Can it be put back together after we have
mined or logged? We know these two things for certain: it can
never be put back as it was, and we are not living "harmlessly"
in our environment. The heroes of the mining and logging days
are now cast in new and different light. The last question follows:
are we willing or is it possible to live without a steel or wood
industry?
It is the third economy of this area that accents the ethical
dilemma for us. It is an economy of a wilderness based in tourism.
For generations this has been a place where people from cities
and farms have escaped to rest, to recreate, to be restored and
to be healed. We live in Superior National Forest, along the Boundary
Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. We offer a life away from human
intervention, and we like to call our remote places "pristine".
Of course they aren't. There were generations of humans living
here before us. They left us with an understanding of land and
animals that makes our present notions of ownership seem almost
pathological. To our ancestors, land and animals were relatives.
That kind of perception is matches in modern times by a spirituality
or mysticism of a relationship, which Martin Buber wrote about
as the "I-Thou" relationship:
I consider a tree.
I can look on it as a picture ...
I can perceive it as movement ...
I can classify it in a specie ...
I can dissipate it and perpetuate it ...
In all this the tree remains my object ...
It can, however, also come about,
if I have both will and grace, that,
in considering the tree
I become bound up in relation to it.
The tree is no longer it.
I have been seized by the power of exclusiveness. |
It takes is out of ourselves as center and manager and, like
God's visitation to Job, it places us in community with all of
creation. It feels profoundly good and timeless. We call it home.
Lastly, the wilderness provides
a window into God's Kingdom. Like the seed growing secretly, it
not only reveals a life that happens beyond our efforts, it also
relates a life narrative whose major theme is one of sacrifice
or "give away". "Unless a grain of wheat falls into the earth
and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears much fruit."
Not only does this suggest an ethic of death/life in behalf of
others, but it is also a narrative jam-packed with gratitude because
so many have died that we may have life. The wilderness provides
us with a vision of life that is truly Eucharistic.
 |
To live, we must daily break the body and shed the blood
of Creation.
When we do this knowingly, lovingly, skillfully, reverently,
it is a sacrament.
(Wendell Berry) |
On January 1, 2007 at the request of St. John's Episcopal Church
(Eveleth), our three congregations dissolved the covenant and
went their separate ways. Although we share a common heritage
and an historical relationship, we now move in our separate futures.
This was originally
written by the Rev Roger Weaver, priest for these locations (June
17, 1980 to January 1, 2002) and modified by Charles Morello in
January 2007 to reflect the change in status of the relationship
of our churches.
|