East Range Episcopal Churches:
who we were
Our name reveals much of who
we were and how we came to be. Until January 2007, we were the
Episcopal Churches located on the eastern end of the Mesabi
Iron Range from the towns of Ely, Tower, Virginia, Eveleth,
and Hoyt Lakes. These towns began as mining towns, and basically
still are mining towns. Usually when a mining town ceases to
be a mining town it becomes a ghost town. Mining is the economy;
it is the reason people gather together and hang their houses
in clusters along the edge of broad and deep pits. Some active
mines have devoured towns as they grew; the towns just disappeared
leaving only rough memories and records of their existence,
sometimes the town moved to leave streets, sidewalks, and steps
behind as sentinels in meadows. We all know that our towns could
go the way of Sparta, Franklin, and Section 30. Some of our
towns are hanging in suspension between mining town and ghost
town. Our very existence depends on our ability to dig, crush
and sell the very rock that we walk and set our houses on. If
we can no longer find the rock, or if it becomes too expensive
to dig it up, or if no one wants to buy it, then we all could
very well become part of the dust left behind as the ore is
shipped out.
Like many other mining towns
we are located in a non-agricultural part of the country. Our
land is not deep top soil, and we don't have warm summer corn-growing
nights. We are a people of the rock, lakes, swamps and forest.
The forest, like mining, has provided another kind of transient
economy. The folklore, the early stories of logging and mining
have much in common. Saloons and brothels were the benchmarks
of the beginning towns. The towns are made up of people on the
move; they were "packsackers", usually bachelors making their
way through to someplace else. Often stories of the men, like
Paul Bunyan and John Henry, achieved heroic stature, with feats
of strength and power. The movement was western. From Michigan
to Wisconsin to Minnesota and on west. Miners followed the iron
ore; loggers followed the white pine. The white pine is gone,
and those loggers who have stayed here now find work logging
pulp wood. They are scattered about in homes sprinkled around
in the woods, and they truck their wood to different industrial
sites. Like mining, clear cutting leaves massive gaps of barren
landscape. Like the ghost towns there are harsh reminders of
what was once forest, but now almost impossible to remember.
We talk about "tree harvest" the way a farmer may talk about
harvesting small grain. We use the words but we know that it
is not the same.
When we think of stewardship
of the iron ore from the mines and the wood from forest that
is entrusted to us, the language and the stories work for a
sense of accountability. But if we try to think of the environmental
stewardship with mining and logging, then the language and the
stories of "stewardship" fall short of describing the ethical
dilemma with which we must live. Can we have steel or wood products
without wreaking extreme violence on the environment? Can it
be put back together after we have mined or logged? We know
these two things for certain: it can never be put back as it
was, and we are not living "harmlessly" in our environment.
The heroes of the mining and logging days are now cast in new
and different light. The last question follows: are we willing
or is it possible to live without a steel or wood industry?
It is the third economy of this
area that accents the ethical dilemma for us. It is an economy
of a wilderness based in tourism. For generations this has been
a place where people from cities and farms have escaped to rest,
to recreate, to be restored and to be healed. We live in Superior
National Forest, along the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness.
We offer a life away from human intervention, and we like to
call our remote places "pristine". Of course they aren't. There
were generations of humans living here before us. They left
us with an understanding of land and animals that makes our
present notions of ownership seem almost pathological. To our
ancestors, land and animals were relatives. That kind of perception
is matches in modern times by a spirituality or mysticism of
a relationship, which Martin Buber wrote about as the "I-Thou"
relationship:
I consider a tree.
I can look on it as a picture ...
I can perceive it as movement ...
I can classify it in a specie ...
I can dissipate it and perpetuate it ...
In all this the tree remains my object ...
It can, however, also come about,
if I have both will and grace, that,
in considering the tree
I become bound up in relation to it.
The tree is no longer it.
I have been seized by the power of exclusiveness. |
It takes is out of ourselves
as center and manager and, like God's visitation to Job, it
places us in community with all of creation. It feels profoundly
good and timeless. We call it home.
Lastly, the wilderness provides
a window into God's Kingdom. Like the seed growing secretly,
it not only reveals a life that happens beyond our efforts,
it also relates a life narrative whose major theme is one of
sacrifice or "give away". "Unless a grain of wheat falls into
the earth and dies, it remains alone; but if it dies, it bears
much fruit." Not only does this suggest an ethic of death/life
in behalf of others, but it is also a narrative jam-packed with
gratitude because so many have died that we may have life. The
wilderness provides us with a vision of life that is truly Eucharistic.
 |
To live, we must daily break the body and shed the
blood of Creation.
When we do this knowingly, lovingly, skillfully, reverently,
it is a sacrament.
(Wendell Berry) |
On January 1, 2007 at the request of St. John's Episcopal Church
(Eveleth), our three congregations dissolved the covenant and
went their separate ways. Although we share a common heritage
and an historical relationship, we now move in our separate
futures.
This was originally
written by the Rev Roger Weaver, priest for these locations
(June 17, 1980 to January 1, 2002) and modified by Charles Morello
in January 2007 to reflect the change in status of the relationship
of these churches.
|